Traduction de «servitu di pubblico passaggio » (Italien → Anglais) :

In order to harmonize the approach to block exemption regulations in the field of State aid, and in accordance with the procedures foreseen in Articles 108(4) and 109 of the Treaty, aid for the coordination of transport or reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service as referred to in Article 93 of the Treaty should be brought under the scope of Regulation (EC) No 994/98.

(11) In relation to aid for transport by rail, road and inland waterways, Article 93 of the Treaty states that aid meeting the needs of coordination of transport or representing reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service shall be compatible with the Treaties.

15. Considers that in mountain areas endeavours should be made to encourage the separation between forests and grazing land and to introduce the requirement to use paths (not least for safety reasons in general), because a lack of separation between forests and grazing land and too much pedestrian traffic causes substantial erosion damage;

15. Considers that in mountain areas endeavours should be made to encourage the separation between forests and grazing land and to introduce the requirement to use paths (not least for safety reasons in general), because a lack of separation between forests and grazing land and too much pedestrian traffic causes substantial erosion damage;

Expenditure on rights of access to the project site during implementation shall be eligible, if it is indispensable to the implementation of the project and specifically approved by the Commission decision to grant assistance.

11. Stresses that the regulatory framework should include a maximum list of absolutely essential conditions to be attached to general authorisations; observes, moreover, that national regulatory authorities must continue to be empowered to obtain business data from operators and must procedurally be able to do so; believes that rights of way do not justify specific authorisation, since this kind of right is not specific to an individual organisation; believes further, that the use of spectrum does not justify individual licences when there is no risk of harmful interference, in particular when spectrum assignment has been harmonised at European level; considers that guidelines to benchmark fee levels could be useful in bringing greater ...[+++]consistency to licence fees across the EU; is concerned to note that the Commission does not discourage spectrum auctions, since auctions tend to raise licence fees above their economic value, raise consumer tariffs and hamper the introduction of new services; encourages the Member States to use the revenues raised as a result of auctions, fees and radio spectrum pricing to create better conditions for the development of an information society and e-commerce in the European Union, in accordance with the conclusions of the Lisbon Summit;